Best Resources for Poets and WritersWinning Writers


Login to The Best Free Literary Contests
Login to Literary Contest Insider


 


Contest Database
Literary Contest Insider
The Best Free Literary Contests
Contests to Avoid
Contests Sponsored by Winning Writers
Sports Fiction & Essay Contest
Wergle Flomp Free Poetry Contest
Contests Assisted by Winning Writers
Tom Howard/Margaret Reid Poetry Contest
Tom Howard/John H. Reid Short Story Contest
Contest Archives
War Poetry Contest Archives
Judge's Advice
FAQ
Past Winners

Contests : War Poetry Contest : Past Winners : 2011 : Judges' Comments

Comments from the Judges of the 2011 War Poetry Contest

Thanks to all the entrants to our tenth annual War Poetry Contest. Sending poems out into the world is always an act of courage, and we honor each and every participant for taking the emotional risk of exploring the topic of war and then taking a second risk by sending the poems out for judging. We received 575 entries of 1-3 poems each. Once again, our talented writers turned their attention to the young men and women returning from our ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan with indelible mental and physical scars. Many of these soldiers were still schoolchildren when the pivotal events of September 11, 2001 occurred. The winning poems remind us that no matter when the war is declared "over", war's aftershocks last a lifetime. Strong entries on such popular themes as Vietnam, World War II, and Israel-Palestine rounded out this year's list.

The Judging

Winning Writers Editor Jendi Reiter narrowed down the entries to a shortlist of about 65, which she shared with Assistant Judge Ellen LaFleche. After coming quickly to agreement on the top picks, we each made the case for our favorite runners-up. Factors that mattered most at this stage were sound, depth, and originality. Reading the contenders aloud clarified which poems had a smoother flow of language and ideas. We favored poems that were about more than their literal subject matter. A good story is interesting, but a good story with wider significance is a winner. More than once, Ellen said, "I want to learn something."

What do we mean by this? While we do appreciate new historical facts, we especially appreciate learning something new emotionally, psychologically, or intellectually.

Ellen observes, "Reuven Goldfarb's 'Champions: Hebrews 1, Philistines 0' not only gave me a fresh perspective on war, mythology, and baseball, but it made me laugh. In three years of judging, this is the first time I laughed out loud while reading a war poem. That was a new emotional experience for me as assistant judge of a war poetry contest, and it raised many interesting questions. How did it feel to laugh about war? Is war ever funny? Why or why not? Can war humor be healing? Should comedians joke about 9-11? Why or why not? Those questions are an example of what I mean by learning something new from a poem."

One pitch-perfect line or distinctive image can make your poem memorable to weary judges who have read hundreds of poems on similar topics. We were both charmed by the deadpan humor of the last line in Goldfarb's poem. The line breaks created the ideal pause to lead up to the punchline. The utterly changed resonance of the "plastic bags" at the beginning and end of Pamela Uschuk's "The Taliban Takes Pakistan" impressed Jendi with the author's skill and emotional power. For Ellen, the metaphor of the scorpions in Bruce Lack's "No Applicable Regulations" never lost its impact after multiple readings. She notes, "This poem also provided me with new information: I had never considered the somewhat obvious fact that soldiers who fight in the desert may have to guard against the sting of scorpions. That new fact was layered with many levels of symbolic meaning, with the scorpions resonating as an evocative metaphor for war."

Disjointed language can effectively convey the dissociative nature of wartime trauma, as well as the anxiety-producing blackout of information on the homefront. Eleanor Paynter used this technique to good effect in "An Interrogation". However, an unclear storyline sometimes worked against other poems. Be careful of throwing too many things onto your collage. Ask yourself, is there a logical reason why these allusions from different contexts belong together? If you use a variety of voices and formatting styles in the same poem, are the shifts dictated by the content, or will it seem like a random bag of tricks?

The Winners

Pamela Uschuk took first prize with a suite of poems that vividly depict the fallout of war in diverse settings. "Horoscope" is a wide-ranging tour of the ravages of "the bird of fear", from African child soldiers, to martyred Burmese monks, to her own brother's cancer caused by Agent Orange in Vietnam. As is often the case in Pam's poetry, the richness and peace of nature provide a fragile space of relief. In the searing "White Phosphorus After Hanukkah", a woman relives the tortuous death of her daughter and grandchild, Palestinian civilians killed by an Israeli bomb. The terrible facts make polemic unnecessary, the irony all too clear: one people's festival of liberation is another's anniversary of oppression. "The Taliban Takes Pakistan" opens provocatively with an unsympathetic main character, a young suicide bomber in training, and makes us see the grief and desperation that drive him.

David Cooke's second-prize poem "Meat Puppet" is both grotesque and poignant in its depiction of a young veteran with an amputated hand. Like a phantom limb, the little boy in him is tangible yet no longer real, his potential for innocent flourishing stunted by war. Arm, vambrace, stump—the words for his wound proliferate yet fail to explain how we allow such maiming to happen.

Michael Estes' concise, elegant third-prize poem "bin laden" is composed entirely of anagrams of the late Al Qaeda leader's name. At first it seems like an enigma with no rhyme or reason, rather the same way Osama was portrayed in Western media. But on careful rereading, it artfully tells the story of Bin Laden's life and death through the many-faceted symbolism that concealed his human vulnerability.

We have decided to retire the War Poetry Contest this year, feeling that both the entrants and the judges would benefit from fresh topics to explore. Our first-ever Sports Poetry & Prose Contest is now open for entries through May 31. We are incredibly grateful to everyone who participated over the past decade. May your reflections on war continue to bring healing and insight to a world in need of peaceful solutions.

Click here to read all of the 2011 winning entries.

Click here to read the winning entries from other years.

Click here for more comprehensive advice for war poetry contestants.

Click here to enter our Sports Fiction & Essay Contest.


Jendi Reiter

Jendi Reiter

Ellen LaFleche

Ellen LaFleche

                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

War Poetry Contest
2011 War Poetry Results

Congratulations to our 2011 prizewinners Pamela Uschuk, David Cooke, and Michael Estes, and to our honorable mentions and finalists.

First Prize - $2,000
Pamela Uschuk
Horoscope; White Phosphorus After Hanukkah; The Taliban Takes Pakistan

Second Prize - $1,200
David Cooke
Meat Puppet

Third Prize - $600
Michael Estes
bin laden

Honorable Mentions
$100 each
Laurie Lee Didesch
Bill Duvall
Reuven Goldfarb
Marilyn Krysl
Bruce Lack
Robert Hill Long
Lynn McGee
Nicole
Eleanor Paynter
Nita Ritzke
Suzanne Roberts
Eliot Khalil Wilson

Finalists
Susan Brennan
J. Scott Brownlee
Sasha Pimentel Chacón
Danielle Jones-Pruett
Danielle Kessinger
Adrie Kusserow
Hugh Martin
Frank Ortega
Robert Schultz
Steven Sparks
Les Wicks




Follow Us on Twitter | Free Newsletter | Customer Service | Contact Us | Privacy | Advertise

Copyright 2001-2013, Winning Writers, Inc. Site design by EyeArchitect.
Beyond fair use, no part of this website may be reproduced without permission.
All rights reserved.
+++